Bites On My Dog's Belly

Contrails Italy according to Wikipedia, or by the case CICAP

"[...] Condensation is a natural phenomenon related to the evaporation of water from the air. A temperature elevate, l’aria assorbe il vapore acqueo fino alla saturazione ed aumenta il suo volume. Raffreddandosi, l’aria espelle il vapore che, a contatto con una superficie più fredda, si condensa trasformandosi in gocce d’acqua . [...] Un metro cubo d’aria, ad esempio, può contenere, alla temperatura di zero gradi ed al livello del mare, un massimo di quattro grammi di acqua. Alla temperatura di venti gradi ne contiene quindici ".

"[...] L’aria che ci circonda è costituita da una certa quantità di vapore acqueo che si forma a causa dell’evaporazione dell’acqua. L’aria assorbe vapore acqueo, soprattutto a temperature elevate, che ne fa aumentare il suo volume e anche il suo peso specifico. Si ha dunque una “umidità relativa” alta, che sarebbe la percentuale di vapore d’acqua contenuto nell’aria. Raffreddandosi l’aria riprende il suo volume originale ed il vapore in essa contenuto viene espulso; qualora il raffreddamento sia molto rapido, come può esserlo l’impatto contro una superficie più fredda, si condensa trasformandosi in gocce d’acqua [...]".

"[...] La condensa sulla superficie del vetro interno all'abitazione è un fenomeno che avviene ogni qualvolta la temperatura di tale faccia interna del vetro scende sino alla cosiddetta temperatura di rugiada. Tanto maggiore risulta la percent relative humidity air, the greater will be the temperature of the glass so you do not experience the phenomenon of condensation [...]".

We reported some texts that explain the phenomenon of condensation in a not in any way imply the phenomenon of contrails produced by planes. This is to show how the parameter "RH " is central and unavoidable in documents not corrupt by misinformation. In addition, in one of the concise and clear descriptions above, it appears as the moisture is gradually decreased in parallel with the decrease of temperature.

Eppure, in questi ultimi mesi, la fisica è cambiata e questo grazie agli "studi" del C.I.C.A.P. e dei suoi "scienziati di livello eccelso". Così ora troviamo, su Wikipedia [ QUI ], alla voce "Scie di condensazione", il seguente squinternato testo:

" Scie di gas di scarico - Dovute al rapido raffreddamento dei gas di scappamento dei motori (sic!), i quali immettono nell'atmosfera, già molto umida [1] (sic!), una quantità di vapore acqueo e nuclei di condensazione sufficienti a provocare il fenomeno (sic!). La temperatura dell'aria più favorevole è quella compresa fra i −25 °C ed i −40 °C (sic!). Esse sono le più persistenti. Ma gli studi (sic!) mostrano come scie di condensazione possono formarsi anche ad umidità relative pari allo 0% (sic!) a patto che la temperatura sia sufficientemente bassa ".

Nel lemma non viene considerato (volutamente) il valore di umidità relativa (almeno il 60%) ed inoltre si confonde (volutamente) il fenomeno definito " trecce di Berenice " (vortici sui profili alari) con il fenomeno della condensa, che è tutt'altra cosa. Inoltre la persistenza delle scie, sebbene venga data per scontata, è invece praticamente impossibile, checché ne dica la N.A.S.A., in quanto, affinché it can exist, must be found relative humidity values \u200b\u200babove 150%, when, on the contrary, from higher altitudes to 8,000 feet, the humidity drops gradually and is almost never more than 7 / 12% and, more often, However, close to 0%. In short contrails are a sham. The percentage of their training is in fact less than 3%. It 's a phenomenon so rare that the word " contrail, which is already written on other occasions, was coined only in 1947.

It 'easy to conclude as a scratchpad to Wikipedia is, in effect, even for those who know only superficially the foundations of physics, a painful climbing on the mirrors, but is even more outrageous that such statements are passed off as the result of "scientific studies" (What? conducted by whom?), when such allegations are only the fruit of lies profusely bestowed on a page of a ' encyclopedia "controlled in some sections, by members of the CICAP, such as the page dedicated to chemtrails, properly locked and editable only by the usual suspects .

We are facing a forgery perpetrated by a handful of individuals who, in turn, adapt the laws of physics for their needs and exploit the ignorance and undeserved authority of the Commons for their sinister purposes.

the page in question there are three photos: one showing B-17 bomber in 1943, one that frames a Boeing 747 with its ... "Contrails" and a third photo of chemtrails, taken January 26, 2001 by a not disinterested Louis Nguyen NASA and defined on the site in question, "contrails".

A NASA photograph of aircraft contrails, taken from I-95 in northern Virginia, January 26, 2001 by NASA scientist Louis Nguyen. Retrieved from [ http://www-pm.larc.nasa.gov/sass/sfc.contrail.1.26.01.JPG ]

" Louis Nguyen, Norfolk, VA - Louis Nguyen is research in computer engineer at NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. He is a satellite expert and works with research and operational weather satellites and derives real-time cloud properties for climate studies and weather applications. He Develops interactive web-based scientific applications. He is a pioneer in satellite calibration and conducts research on aircraft icing and contrails .

The analysis of photos of B-17 [ HERE], once processed, proves to have been made the well-known graphics program Photoshop (and it is not the only one!), as evidenced by this log file . In short the tool we used to highlight tampering of the image, we obtain the following information:

NOTE: Photoshop IRB detected
Based on the analysis of compression Characteristics and EXIF \u200b\u200bmetadata:
ASSESSMENT: Class 1 - Image is processed / edited
Appears to be new signature for Photoshop.

In step they impersonating a "contrail of a JAL 747 [ HERE], you notice a detail that often occurs in the analysis of aerial photographic chemicals [ HERE another example]. If you look carefully, you will notice that the trails, apparently from drains of the left engine of the Boeing 747, crossing up to exchange of position: the trail closer to the fuselage moves away to the outside and vice versa occurs with the outer wake, forming an X. This demonstrates that contrails actually come from special sprinklers installed on the main route of turbofan, but visibly misaligned. If not, that is really what we see if they were contrails , we must assume that the two motors are out of alignment, but that, in all honesty, it is absolutely impossible!

At this point, it seems clear that the Wikipedia page dedicated to the contrails is a desperate fake from head to foot, but do not stop here. Come on over and dispel another "workhorse" of misinformation. To that end, we must take a step back, namely in 2006. At that time it was taken for granted, even by those who deny the phenomenon of chemtrails, which for the formation of contrails was still necessary to fly above the 8,000 meters (now quacks claim that contrails can be formed even at zero) to meet with a certain amount of humidity in the atmosphere. At the limit, we discussed the phenomenon of persistence, a phenomenon that, theoretically, it can take only in case of very high percentages of relative humidity (+150%), with the so-called oversaturation, which was and should still be a key parameter. But no. The current clique of uninformative dissertations cite the persistence of "contrails" in a generic way without specifying that it can occur only in science fiction cases of oversaturation. In fact, as already mentioned many times, we have clarified that, at high altitudes, the relative humidity drops to nil. In the texts

introduction to the article, we saw that the condensation can occur with low or no humidity. Yet Italy on Wikipedia we read: " But studies show that contrails may occur even at 0% relative humidity provided the temperatura sia sufficientemente bassa ".

A quali studi ci si riferisce e chi sarebbero gli autorevoli scienziati che propalano un'eresia del genere? Qualche nome al di sopra di ogni sospetto? Qualcuno ci spieghi come sia possibile la sublimazione del vapore acqueo se questo è assente!

" Condensazione in liquido o in solido - La condensazione di un vapore può generare o un liquido o un solido, a seconda della temperatura del vapore. Se essa è maggiore di 0°C, il vapore condensa in acqua (condensazione vera e propria) formando nebbia o rugiada; se, invece, la temperatura è minore di 0°C, il vapore ghiaccia subito formando brina senza passare dalla fase liquida, ma trasformandosi direttamente gas in solid (sublimation or brinazione) .

The B-17 of the second conflict could operate at full load and without pressurization, at high altitudes and temperatures so low? Apparently not.

" At the outbreak of World War II, the Douglas DB1 proved a little too powerful, while the 299 model was further developed and renamed YB17 much more powerful and could fly at a much larger share, but the American Army Air Corps had only 30. In 1941, 20 B-17 were shipped to Britain, but did not show great qualities: the first flight in the UK fell: in the first mission, it freezes the machine guns and bombs were dropped off target. To overcome these problems, the British increased the armor and weapons, reducing the operative height. The B-17 was used in all theaters of operations of the Second World War. The first transaction was in August 1942. It was later used primarily for precision daylight bombing [a share close to 4,000 meters - ed] up factories and refineries by the USAF, while the RAF was responsible for nocturnal .

To be always on the side of reason, the uninformed hours assert that the necessary moisture (and that clearly is not at high altitudes) is entirely produced by turbofan last generation. And 'possible? One of our friend and collaborator wanted to pursue the matter and is satisfied, through elaborate calculations, that the production of water vapor of a modern jet engine is totally insignificant and would have absolutely not allow the formation of condensation trails (of any kind) for the sole supply of moisture from the engine. The study will be published as soon as possible.

conclude with a necessary clarification.

The publication of this article has one intention: to prevent the gradual rewriting of history and the laws of physics. Prevent brainwashed by factions clearly interested in the truth sink and conceal what is happening with impunity in our skies devastated.


[1] A shares over 8,000 meters, or the commercial aircraft flight altitudes, the relative humidity is often close to 0%.

Game Shark Cheats Fire Red Pgsphone

The "Memphis Belle": another false contrailscience.com

The workhorse of the army of disinformation in the wake of Paul Attivissimo and managed by CICAP and intelligence, is often represented by this piece movie . This is the documentary entitled: " The Memphis Belle: A Story of a Flying Fortress . The movie was in 1944. At the fifteenth minute that those are shown, a careful eye, appear to actually be condensation trails (contrails ) and in fact in the film are defined as such. Not surprisingly, the "historical record" shows a certain epoxynous , editor of the Web site of disinformation "Contrailscience.com", already known to have forged several jobs, including two texts dedicated to the phenomena elements.

We do not know if the documentary in question is handling well done, but if it is accepted that this is not a forgery, it becomes apparent an important detail: the "contrails" grow immediately next to the engine exhaust . It also does not seem to alcune scie vengano prodotte dagli scarichi dei motori a scoppio delle fortezze volanti, ma da altri apparati adiacenti (ugelli?).



Vediamo che cosa scrive Gianni Comoretto, famigerato negazionista delle scie chimiche e componente del C.I.C.A.P. (sono stati volutamente lasciati gli errori grammaticali):

[...] " Nel caso delle normali scie di condensa, cioè vapore degli scarichi che condensa in aghi di ghiaccio, la scia si forma sempre dietro al motore, ad una distanza che tipicamente è di alcune decine di metri (se fa MOLTO freddo può essere di 5-10 metri). Se invece si tratta di qualcosa of sprayed from a plane will depart from different points, (sic) and will immediately begin . "These allegations can not be questioned, since it comes from an illustrious exponent of CICAP to Bacchus!

addition to this we must highlight, once again, that the bombers of the Second World War, when fully loaded to accomplish their mission, were not able to operate at high altitudes and often did not exceed, in the operational flight, the 6,000 meters above sea level. We know now that contrails can not possibly occur at altitudes lower than 8,000 meters. So what we show this video? One of the first aerosol della storia? Forse, a meno che non siamo di fronte ad un ennesimo documento spurio ben congegnato.

Appare inoltre strana la dettagliata spiegazione tecnica del fenomeno inerente alla condensazione, quasi come fosse una diretta e consequenziale risposta ad obiezioni mosse solo sessant'anni dopo, in riferimento alla questione "scie chimiche". D'altronde il tema delle scie di condensa era considerato a tal punto irrilevante che il termine "contrail" fu coniato solo nel 1947.

Per concludere, solleviamo un altro dubbio...

Può apparire realistica e veritieria la temperatura dichiarata nel documentario dalla voce fuori campo, se, come si può ben notare, gli occupanti della fortezza volante non mostrano tracce of frost on his face, despite the presence of strong air currents from the outside? E 'then can the absence of pressurization at higher altitudes to 8000 meters? Obviously not. It 'clear that those shots were not performed at high altitude and then it is suspected that contrails shown in the video are not the product of condensation, but yet another manipulation.

In the movie below, always extract from "The Memphis Belle: A Story of a Flying Fortress", we can observe that many bombers make no contrail.



Being exposed to a wind of 60 km / h at a temperature of 5 ° Celsius is to be exposed to a temperature lower environmental
to over 10 ° Celsius below zero. This obviously is of great importance to the exposed parts of the body like the face.

prolonged exposure to cold can cause a state of hypothermia. There is talk of hypothermia when the body core temperature drops below 35 ° C. Symptoms become increasingly severe until the limits of survival for body temperatures of 27-24 ° C. The freezing occurs to the skin surface temperatures below -2 ° C. To freeze the exposed parts of the body is required
equivalent temperature of at least -30 ° C. The risk of freezing to the naked parts begins already at an ambient temperature of -5 ° C when exposed to a wind of 60 km / h or at -10 ° C with a wind of 30 km / h.

Based on these objective data and irrefutable, we can deduce that a crew subjected to temperatures near 40 degrees below zero, in the presence of strong drafts from the outside, caused by the movement of their aircraft (not pressurized) to over 300 km / h, obviously would have to freeze instantly.

Things That Doctors Can Find Through Blood

casinos Cassinis

From the beginning everything has been studied at the table (including story of climate change due to CO2) to cover the operations aersosol, born in the activities of HAARP and follow (second program) to manage and control the population (see The Air Force wants you LOV). As stated several times, the weather modification is a need, not the main objective . The latest polymer analysis of relapse we have received confirm that the polymers (not sure the cobwebs of Simone Angioni - CICAP) used as carriers for metal and smart nanostructures, are designed to be biocompatible as possible, so as to be absorbed (via air, food, water) from living beings (human subjects) without showing symptoms of rejection for excessive intake of foreign bodies (see Morgellons Disease ).

It seems evident that here we are dealing with a deliberate, wicked pollution completely insane, and for purposes that have nothing to do with protection from direct sunlight or similar amenities. Stories that even our great-grandfather would have been drinking. But ... speaking of grandparents, the Swiss Guard for excellence, the genius of the buffalo, the ineffable Paul Attivissimo , not yet satisfied with the miserable figures collected patched insulting posts about post devoted to chemtrails and oriented according to its objectives (and those who manage it), to close once and for all the game with the National Committee Tanker Enemy , asks for help from a distinguished and elderly man who, incidentally, seems to have a family relationship with a famous "debunker "That Richard Cassinis . The 'expert' whose turn is Dr. Robert Cassinis, professor, former professor of Geophysics, University degli Studi di Milano, Facoltà di Geologia. Pare che costui sia davvero poco super partes, in quanto, se svolgiamo una piccola ricerca, otteniamo questi risultati:

Prof. Roberto Cassinis , Direttore dell'Istituto di Geofisica della litosfera del C.N.R. - Milano, rappresentante C.N.R., Membro Comitato Scientifico OdisseoSpace - Le tecnologie satellitari al servizio dell’uomo - Geologia tecnica & ambientale - Journal of technical & environmental geology - Rivista trimestrale dell'Ordine Nazionale dei Geologi - Comitato scientifico: Roberto CASSINIS

http://www.odisseospace.it/

Collaborations with the following entities:

of the Académie Nationale de l'Air et Espace - Toulouse
AIF - Association for the Teaching of Physics - Section of Milan
AIPAS - Italian Association SME Aerospace - Rome
Carlo Gavazzi Space - Italian Milan
ECSL National Points of Contact - CNR - Rome and Paris
ESA - Space Education Div - Paris
ICOS - Institute for Scientific Communication - Milan
LYCEUM - Cultural Association Training and Upgrade - Milan
Brera Astronomical Observatory - Milano
POLITECNICO DI MILANO – Cattedra di Logistica – Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale
Studio Legale Corabi - Milano
Université de Toulouse 1 – IEID – Institut d’Etudes Internationales et de Développement
VSSD - Virtual Space Sciences Department


Davvero disinteressata l'opinione di questo insigne luminare!

Ma ecco che cosa scrive Roberto Cassinis sul blog di Attivissimo dedicato alle scie chimiche - La bufala delle scie chimiche - Fatti e spiegazioni scientifiche del presunto (sic) complotto delle scie degli aeroplani


Roberto Cassinis :

" Legends and witchcraft spread easily in these environments as can be seen exploring the most modern and comprehensive means of information, the "network" computer. Many of the falsehood is gathered and disseminated to art, economic and moral damage to persons or organizations. Other (few) are made in good faith by gullible or ignorant. Some may remember the old Milanese still "the Paneroni" that in the postwar years he held rallies in Piazza del Duomo arguing that Galileo was wrong: it was the sun revolved around the Earth.

The stories in circulation are also fertile ground in a public "informed"; the cause is often the short memory of many, one wonders of facts and phenomena already known and explained by earlier generations, then, perhaps, forgotten by the same person who had lived by young people.

One of the many modern stories

For example, it was rumored that the white contrails (condensation trails) left by aircraft across the sky is not due to a natural phenomenon but the deliberate release of chemicals that have the purpose aims to dispel the clouds or "military" is not specified (eg. the spread of epidemics). These fantasies adding that this is a new phenomenon that began only a few years ago, certainly non prima della seconda metà del secolo scorso.

Effettivamente, di strisce bianche in cielo oggi se ne vedono molte di più di qualche anno fa per la semplice ragione che il traffico aereo è in continuo aumento ".

Quest'ultima affermazione non incanta più nessuno, poiché va in netto contrasto con i dati ufficiali:

"(WAPA) - Nel 2009, la crisi economica farà diminuire il traffico aereo in Europa del 5%. A dirlo è una previsione a breve termine di Eurocontrol, l'organizzazione europea per la sicurezza della navigazione aerea. Nei prossimi 12 mesi, un calo del numero dei voli sarà una costante per il vecchio continente, con Paesi come Francia, Italia, Spagna, Germania and Sweden, which will be particularly affected.

According to forecasts, the decline in traffic will affect all sectors. Even low-cost airlines are not immune from the crisis, given that in November 2008 recorded the first failure in 15 years and in February this year flew for 5% less than the same month of 2008 (calculated as if it was not a leap month). This decrease is even more business traffic, which dropped by 21%. The weakness of the transatlantic trade annulled the treaty benefits of Open Skies between the U.S. and the EU, signed last spring.

The economic crisis is affecting the traffic on three fronts: lower production and lower earnings mean less to transport goods and lower demand for air travel, and secondly, the difficulties of access to credit has impeded the restructuring and investment companies and contributed to their bankruptcy, and finally, the recent migration flows within Europe, which led to an increase in demand for air transport, now seem counter. "(Thanks to bedevan for the tip)

" The performances of the years 1943-44

The writer retains the memory indelible performances grandiose "enjoyed" free in the Mediterranean 65 or 66 years ago. The place of observation was a highly mobile platform, the surface of the sea and often sulky driven by short-wave crests with foaming .

[...]. Here we seem to read the romantic Massimo Santacroce . There are violins and then we are full.

There also seems to read the ravings of a member of the CICAP (Italian Committee for the Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal). One randomly? Steno Ferluga , for example, but even Paul himself or Attivissimo 'distinguished Paul Toselli would cast the same stereotyped way. And' the case of repeat that they are truly a paranormal phenomenon on which to study!

" And then, every now and then, another spectacle above us in heaven, countless bundles of white contrails that flew over us. The planes were produced that were barely visible in the large B17 (Flying Fortress) or B24 (Liberator) [...]

immediately evident a contradiction: according to the astronomer at Arcetri Comoretto Gianni, in fact, a plane is already distinguishable from 30,000 meters, but , according to Roberto Cassinis, exhumed relative of the already known disinformation Richard Cassinis (nonnob), an expert nanorobotics wireless, the B-17 were barely visible. Agree! The B-17 and B-24 aircraft that were slightly more than the 30-meter wingspan. They were then compared to a modern A320. It 's impossible to share such a high spot so if you already are "small" when flying below the piles, and then a much smaller share of the eight thousand. So, while George Comoretto flaunts the "S" on Superman's chest, Cassinis blatantly contradicts it.

The B-24 had a market share of tangency corresponding to 8,500 meters, while the B-17 maxes out at 10,900 feet above sea level. As already explained on other occasions, these Flying Fortresses were not able, fully loaded, to get a quote suitable for training of contrails, because the thin air and the loss of engine efficiency have greatly reduced the flight range, and then at least compromise the return to base.

The B-17 is the result of a specific request of 8 August 1935 from part of the 'American Army Air Corps for a bomber capable of reaching 400 km / h, with a range of 3,200 km and with a operational altitude of 3,000 meters .

Model 299 (Boeing B-29 Superfortress) further developed and renamed YB17 was much more powerful and could fly at a much larger share, but the 'American Army Air Corps had only thirty. was not fully operativo prima del 1945 . Nel 1941 20 B-17 furono spediti in Inghilterra ma non dimostrarono grandi doti: il primo in volo sull'Inghilterra precipitò, durante la prima missione, le mitragliatrici si ghiacciarono e le bombe furono sganciate fuori obiettivo.

Per ovviare a questi problemi gli inglesi aumentarono la corazza e l'armamento riducendo la quota operativa .

Viene da chiedersi, alla luce di questi dettagli, come il Cassinis sia stato in grado di veder volare dei B-17 o qualunque altro velivolo, oltre gli 8.000 metri.

A pagina undici di un vecchio testo "La fisica della particelle" di Kenneth W. Ford (versione originale 1965, quinta versione del 1980, Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, Milan) it says: "When a jet goes high in the sky, is formed in its wake a cloud of ice crystals clearly visible, even if you can not see the device .

" We did a lot of questions about the nature of the trails: it seemed logical that the cruising altitude of the planes (8000-10000 m) could be the condensation of water vapor content in the exhaust gases of the engines (in this case it was piston engines, but the same phenomenon occurs for jet aircraft), the condensation is so great an extent as to that portion of the order of the outside temperature is - 40 ° C ". [...]

cruising altitude (altitude operations) and tangent altitude are not the same thing and, as we have seen, the share of operational B-17 was much lower than 8,000 meters!

Also note that the Cassinis hour is enough moisture produced by the engines, so that they form a trail of condensation and in the atmosphere, according to this "luminary" is not necessary to have relative humidities. Physics has changed!

" then I remember that the airplane cabins were not pressurized and that the crew wore heated suits with oxygen delivery .

The problem was not only the radius of action, but also the lack of pressurization. Moreover, the presence of drafts of icy air crew forced to dress in bulky winter clothes and heated suits! Even machine guns were likely to freeze. We hypothesize that the

Cassinis had twenty years time? Well, how could he be so well informed on certain technical issues? I had read on Wikipedia?

We must also highlight the sham operated dall'inclito geophysicist. He argues in his speech honey and misleading, which according to independent researchers (which he defined gullible and ignorant), before the mid-90s, contrails non esistevano. Veramente ripetiamo che sono le chemtrails ad essere manifestazione recente (salvo alcune eccezioni), mentre le scie di condensa sono, per quanto assai infrequenti, un fenomeno risalente alla prima metà degli anni '40. Non è un caso se il termine contrails fu coniato nel 1945 . Sarebbe dunque interessante capire come sia possibile che il Cassinis conoscesse così bene il fenomeno delle "condensation trails" già nel 1943, se la parola "contrail" fu coniata solo due anni dopo, ovvero nel 1945 (Vedi Etymonline sotto la voce inerente).

Vediamo ora cosa possiamo leggere su un testo cartaceo del 2006:

" L’immissione atmosphere in the exhaust of the air-rich nuclei and condensation of water vapor, leads to oversaturation of water vapor and, therefore, the formation of contrails. Contrails are formed at heights where the air temperature is very low (below -40 ° C), with relative humidity of 60%. Contrails can be more or less long-lasting, depending on the stability of the air and the amount of vapor present . "

[Jerome Sansosti & Alfio Giuffrida - Manual of Meteorology, A guide to understanding the weather and climate
in conjunction with the UAI (Union of Amateur Astronomers Italian) - Publisher Gremese - 2006 - P. 86] The

Cassinis forget, incidentally, the humidity factor, wanting to believe that it is required to make the moisture produced by the engine exhaust gas that formed the contrails and do not forget that at high altitudes' s relative humidity is close to zero percent. Who is the crook?

" My testimony seems to" cut off the head of the bull. "Contrails are the planes have since risen to about 8000 m. But I am old and now witnesses of the" contrail "then it remained well few. And then the witness is not enough to convince the gullible. I can remember that, according to many ladies belonging the good society, the magic of Vanna Marchi bags of gold worth? .

Cassinis Doctor, do not you think that his improvident intervention has exacerbated the mess already created by his collaborators? We see very wretched for the uninformed.

Richard Cassinis to his father :

"Father, you see if you can put a patch. He told me rat (Paul Attivissimo to his friends) that we need an authoritative voice, because we are gasping. The insults, threats, discredited, have not had any effect. Straker does not want to retire! Put you a patch. Invented something. Writing that contrails (condensation eh!) You still remember them from when you took the milk from her grandmother Maria. He told me that rat gives carte blanche, as long as you put a patch, which threatens to sink the boat here and the military are breaking the c. .. they want results, that this break ... Straker's really tired.

So, Dad, are you? "And

father Roberto, including an expletive and the other (he wanted to enjoy the super-retirement in peace), and so accepts, with assistance from a couple of his former students (and the Fioba hanmi), wrote a couple of bales of poetry peppered a man lived, wise and old. Et Volia, the article by Paul Attivissimo is ready. Brindisi with champagne and group dinner to celebrate the happy event.